Thanks a lot for the response. I just wanted to clarify something which I could not find in the info you sent. I understand as the network owner I am considered the "API Caller", however I am not sure if I am better off with chained payments or parallel payments. The main question I have revolves around fees and refunds. For example, If the sale amount is $10 and I want to keep $1 and give the (3rd party) seller of the service $9, I understand that this can be achieved using either parallel or chained payments with the difference being who the buyer sees as the seller. However, who is responsible for paying fees and providing refunds in either scenario? Is there a difference between parallel vs. chained regarding refunds or fees? I think I understand that the "Primary Receiver" is the person who is responsible for refunds and pay PayPal fees, so in the case of a chained payment and/or parallel payment, who is the Primary Receiver? I am looking for a solution that does NOT make me liable to pay refunds, chargebacks or fees (at least not on the $9 payment that goes to the seller) nor responsible for the quality of the service delivered etc. Also I want seller to pay PayPal fees out of the $9, so which should I choose chained or parallel or is there another option? Thanks a lot for your help! Edit: I found info about fees, it appears fees can be structured in almost any way, regardless if parallel or chained, but did not find any info about refunds, chargebacks, liability, etc. Thanks again.
... View more