Further to my last reply I have now logged into my PayPal online account and discover that while access to my funds is still withheld, PayPal have lifted the restriction on allowing me to pay funds INTO my account. This seems completely illogical and furthermore an insult to injury. In short, PayPal is happy to accept funds into my PayPal account (from my bank account on which they allegedly spotted unusual activity) but are preventing from me accessing this money. Can anyone give a justification for this ? I am asking again exactly what unusual activity did PayPal allegedly spot on my bank account? My bank has not been able to find any unusual activity so will PayPal provide me with details given that this activity seems to be the reason why PayPal has limited my account. Returning to the issue of my NOT having Photo ID, is it simply PayPal policy to seize funds in PayPal accounts when people have no Photo ID and then refuse to return those funds? If Photo ID was going to be required, why did PayPal omit this information when I created the account a time when PayPal happily and with no qualms accepted my payments into that account? In addition, why on two occasions from two different PayPal sources did PayPal advise me that my birth certificate and council tax form would be sufficient forms of ID? Finally, if PayPal are happy to accept funds from my bank account perhaps they might consider paying back into my bank account the funds I have paid into their account? Regards, Kevin <removed>
... View more