Well, although you seem to have good feedback, you are flat wrong about your reply to me. I know, without a doubt, that I did not violate in any of the ways you mentioned. As a matter of fact, scouring the user agreement, the only thing that hit even close to my personal use of PayPal that could be considered a violation was that I had an uptick in sales the week leading to my account being limited. Basically telling, I used their service too much, which doesn't make the slightest sense. I always use goods, just to ensure they get their fees, I didn't even transfer to my bank account, which was free, I transfered to my debit card, to give them a fee. I have spoken with another person who had a suddenly lender account. They wrote multiple entities, and finally, when legal got involved, PayPal restored their account. The reason they stated it was banned, I saw the official email, was PayPal "thought the account was used to stream adult videos." They limited that account because they thought it was used for cam video sales. After legal threats, PayPal said they looked at the case closer and decided the account didn't violate. That person used their account for the same thing I did. Selling/buying lapel pins. I could gladly pull up my activity to prove I did nothing wrong. They have limited 100s of accounts in the lapel pin community, including businesses. It's not legit, it's crap. They want business, sure, but they also want to freeze money so that they have access and the OWNER doesn't. So, knowledgeable though you may be, you are gravely mistaken on your thoughts for my situation. Thanks
... View more