PLEASE GOOGLE THE FOLLOWING LAWSUITS VS. PAYPAL Zepeda v. PAYPAL, INC Fernando v. PayPal, Inc. Craig Comb, et al. v. PayPal, Inc. EVERY ONE THAT IS CURRENTLY HAVING THIS SAME ISSUE SHOULD EMAIL THE ATTORNEY ZEPEDA USED AND SEE IF WE CAN'T GET ANOTHER CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ROLLING. THE CASE Craig Comb, et al. v. PayPal, Inc. STATES "Court holds that both PayPal's User Agreement, and the arbitration clause found therein, are unconscionable under California law. The Court accordingly denies motions by PayPal to compel users who commenced putative class action suits arising out of PayPal's allegedly inappropriate handling of customer accounts and/or complaints to resolve their claims via arbitration. The Court held that the User Agreement and the arbitration clause therein are unconscionable because they: (1) permit PayPal to issue binding amendments to the User Agreement at any time without notice to users; (2) obligate users to arbitrate their disputes pursuant to the commercial rules of the AAA, which is cost prohibitive in light of the average size of a PayPal transaction; (3) obligate users who reside nationwide to arbitrate in Santa Clara county, California, where PayPal is located; (4) permit PayPal to freeze and maintain possession of the funds in customer accounts until any dispute is resolved; and (5) require users to pursue their claims individually, and not via a class action. Taken together, the Court held these provisions made the User Agreement unconscionable, and appear to represent an attempt by PayPal "to insulate itself contractually from any meaningful challenge to its alleged practices." SEEMS LIKE THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING ISSUE WITH PAYPAL AND SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE STOPPED, THE BEST WAY TO STOP THEM IS BAND TOGETHER.
... View more