The term seller protection is misleading?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In my opinion the term PayPal sellers protection is misleading.
We sent goods from our website for Valentine's to a relative of the sender. Now the sender is claiming that he did not make the purchase.
Since the Payment was done through PayPal with a credit card, the credit card company of the sender is now disputing the transaction. We have to pay € 14,00 for this dispute and PayPal is telling us that if the claim is not in our advance we also lose the money that was paid. This is the misleadin part because PayPal gives the sellers the idea that they are complety protected against FRAUDE however they are not. Seller can't control this and have to rely on PayPal when customers pay. PayPall is MISLEADING seller.
- Labels:
-
Disputes & Chargebacks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As paypal gives both sellers and buyers protection how can they give 100% protection to both parties??
You have to read up on either the buyer OR seller protection policies to see what they do or do not cover you for and then risk assess your sales.
Just like insurance companies and credit card companies they all have terms and conditions and can't cover you for 'everything'.
Advice is voluntary.
Kudos / Solution appreciated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Haven't Found your Answer?
It happens. Hit the "Login to Ask the community" button to create a question for the PayPal community.
- Permanent Limitation in Transactions
- Item bought with PayPal Credit via eBay Section 75 Claim Refused in Products & Services
- paypal closed my case before the day ended in Security and Fraud
- This has to be the worst customer service ever in Transactions
- Friends&Family Chargeback Protection for Seller in Security and Fraud