The only way to fight PayPal is to prove that they're breaking their User Agreement first, because they can't hold you to an agreement that they're constantly violating. In context, there are probably legal grounds to circumvent the small claims court clause in the Agreement if PayPal is constantly breaking their own rules in a way that's hurtful to you. It's not hard to find gaps where they're violating things if you read the long version of the PayPal User Agreement in full.
For example, if they state they will provide you with information and they don't, they're violating the agreement. If they do it over and over again, then it demonstrates that they systematically do not care to follow it. If they do it repeatedly, and those actions are hurtful to you, and they should have reasonably known their actions were hurtful to you, then that's harassment by legal definition. A judge wouldn't automatically throw a case out of court due to a clause if this is the case. He might, but he'll have to think about the legalities quite a bit before he does.
That hasn't been my plan, I just want to get back up and running, but that's the way I see it. As much as I'd love to say, "I want to bring PayPal down," I keep telling myself I'd rather they just treated their customers with a decent minimum standard so we can keep things going nicely.
